John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:mbs703dhu4djpifoepou650021jod1m1pd@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:01:56 -0700, Kurt <labolide@spacegmail.com> wrote
> in <labolide-093C25.08015623032007@news.giganews.com>:
>
>>I think it only covers his commute in Oakland.
>
> 1. I don't commute, through Oakland or anywhere else.
>
> 2. My observations are based on numerous carefully-controlled tests of
> multiple handsets throughout the greater San Francisco Bay Area.
>

And exactly what "controls" were in place? What calibration instrumentaion
was used to baseline each unit? What was the timeframe of the testing?
How were atmospheric changes addressed and compensated for?

Unless you can answer all of those questions (and more) with answers that
follow the generall aceepted practices of testing cellular coverage, youyr
little experiment belongs in an elementary school science fair- about third
grade would be appropriate.