"Don Udel \(ETC\)" <donudel@ellijay.com> wrote in news:evaj1e01qr1
@enews4.newsguy.com:

>
> "Scott" <how.do@you.do> wrote in message
> news:VuSdnaBMQO-7eIrbnZ2dnUVZ_rOqnZ2d@adelphia.com...
>> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>> news:jegf135fhlthrhu7bu56pa7gmda3hpj0kk@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 06:08:24 -0500, "Sarge" <sarge@36db.com> wrote in
>>> <ev7u31$ana$1@news.datemas.de>:
>>>
>>>>"nikkir" <nikkir.5754cd@cellbanter.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:nikkir.5754cd@cellbanter.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone else getting dropped calls with cingular service?
>>>>> http://www.rfshieldbox.com
>>>>
>>>>a bunch lately
>>>
>>> Try a better phone.
>>>
>>
>> I love it when Navas admites that Cingular sells sub-standard phones to
>> their customers.
>
> Come on Scott. You never heard of an unlocked phone?
>
> Don
>
>
>

Sure I have. The key here is that this is far from the first time that he
has immediately blamed the phone for coverage issues, and in well over 90%
of those cases the phone in question was purchased directly from Cingular.
I would be willing to bet that this is the case here as well.