John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:q1ds13907scf5f64mtjkpcj0imqisnqrrg@4ax.com:

> On 12 Apr 2007 05:41:49 -0700, "HK" <Harlan.Koehn@gmail.com> wrote in
> <1176381709.706994.323220@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups .com>:
>

>
>>$10 per day would make me squirm a little. I do like the idea of
>>having this available for occasional use, but if you use it more than
>>five times a month, you might as well have a data plan. $5 per day
>>sounds a lot more agreeable, considering it would raise the "need-for-
>>a-data-plan" threshold to a more acceptable level.
>
> The problem is that the carrier can't make money at that kind of low
> price point on such a complex service -- even $10 is probably too low.
> That's why data packages make sense for both the carrier and the
> customer.
>

They can't make money on a normalized price of $300/month? Are you smoking
the shitty crack again?