In article <r7vq13h4mkvcp3q4ksbk5qg1ie45caks5j@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:00:10 -0700, no_body@home.com wrote in
> <88tq1351dilg2kl868eat4et04ijvlcoaa@4ax.com>:
>
> >On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:03:01 GMT, John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:34:57 -0700, no_body@home.com wrote in
> >><80eq139ue403sna2rqn7j9un9ej6kve21h@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:28:28 -0700, no_body@home.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>Seems like "Oooops, Navas stepped in it again"
> >>
> >>More like "Oooops, stirred up the childish trolls again"
> >
> >childish trools: Did nothing of the sort. My original post was to
> >demonstrate why it would not pay me to change from the 32K SIM to the 64K
> >SIM. My post was not intended to trool.
>
> It was nonetheless wrong.
>
> >YOU on the other hand jumped in with both hands & feet finally ending up
> >sticking your foot in your mouth. IMHO you got EXACTLY what you deserve.
> >Like one of the responders said:: your credibility is shit.
>
> My credibility isn't affected by nasty misstatements like that, which
> only serve to diminish your own credibility.
>
> >You sound like a Cingular lap dog.
>
> You sound like a 12 year old.

LOL - get a room you guys...

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"