On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:10:37 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd
L. Davidson) wrote:

>kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:
>>This is true but not so useful within the context of the
>>thread. Keep in mind that no matter what a thread is about,
>>we could endlessly elaborate about the involved technology
>>and in the end it would just be a lot of waste.
>
>In the end, if he has learned about the pitfalls *before hand*
>he won't be having to fix them after the fact.
>
>I don't think a word of that was not useful within the context
>of the thread. The fact that the OP didn't yet know what the
>next step will be doesn't mean he won't be taking it.

Perhaps, but if he had been interested in the entire
switching knowledgebase, there are online tutorials for
that. Usually someone is seeking more directly applicable
information towards their expressed goal.