Donald McTrevor wrote:

" I don't think the benchmarks are wrong because if they are they must
have got a whole series of them wrong, here the PIII 700 is also slower.
I think the truth is the K6-2 is a great processor which punches above
it weight in some applications. "


How about these benchmarks?
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/1999...eleron-07.html

They show the K6-2/300 being battered by everything else on the list,
and it only includes processors up to the Pentium II 450. Trying to
claim that your K6-2/300 is faster than a Pentium III 933 is a joke.
It's safe to assume that the website you refer to fucked up big time
with their tests.