"David Clayton" <dcstarXYZ@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news
an.2007.06.21.08.33.47.4134@myrealbox.com...
> Now now, just because the way the count of "Unemployed" has changed (on a
> regular basis) in the last 30 or so years shouldn't stop pollies comparing
> "Apples with Oranges" to suit their agendas.
It never has before.
> Doesn't one hour of work a week now count a person as "employed"?
As I already pointed out, ZERO hours qualifies you as "employed", unless you
are *specifically* on full unemployment benefits.
MrT.