Two Bob <dept9@iprimus.com.au> wrote:

>>>>> Telstra/Telecom has always been the bottleneck as far as speed
>>>>> goes. I remember when they said that 75bpm was quite sufficient,
>>>>> and they wouldnt budge from that high speed even though everyone
>>>>> was screaming for better speeds.

>>>> And Telecom/Telstra never ever offered anything that did
>>>> 75bpm so they cant have ever made that claim anyway.

>>> Pity about VIATEL / Discovery.

> Actually that was 1200/75

Nothing like your original pathetic excuse for bullshit and at that time they also
offered faster than that, for a higher prices, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist.

>> That was nothing like the maximum rate it could do.

> Yes with a faster modem it could go a heap faster, but telecom didnt have the foresight to support
> the higher speeds.

Pig ignorant lie. You were welcome to pay for
a faster service if you wanted one, and we did.

>> And that wasnt even the upstream speed of that anyway.

>> That silly old fart has never ever had a fucking clue, and thats
>> obviously why even telecom gave it the bums rush, right out the door.

> Other way around, I couldnt get out of there quick enough. I was
> dying of bordom and lack of a decent wage. I went to a company who
> paid 3 times as much and give you something to do when a contract was filled. In telecom if we had
> a 4 month contract and we filled it in 4 weeks we had to sit on our arse until the 4 months were
> over.

You were clearly so stupid that you didnt even notice that you could
have faster than 1200/75 if you wanted it, and that that aint 75bpm anyway.