>
>>>>> And Telecom/Telstra never ever offered anything that did
>>>>> 75bpm so they cant have ever made that claim anyway.
>
>>>> Pity about VIATEL / Discovery.
>
>> Actually that was 1200/75
>
> Nothing like your original pathetic excuse for bullshit and at that time
> they also
> offered faster than that, for a higher prices, you pathetic excuse for a
> bullshit artist.

As I have said in the past, comprehension is lacking with a few ppl around
here. My above speed comment (1200/75) was in relation to Viatel. My
original claim was nearly 20 years before that, when modems were the size of
suitcases and had half a dozen cards in them. Do you remember those days?? I
do, cause I attended one of the first schools in modems. Oh, thats right,
you were sitting at the back of the class using a false name. After all,
someone said you were with the PMG for 40 years )

>>> That was nothing like the maximum rate it could do.
>
>> Yes with a faster modem it could go a heap faster, but telecom didnt have
>> the foresight to support the higher speeds.
>
> Pig ignorant lie. You were welcome to pay for
> a faster service if you wanted one, and we did.
>
>>> And that wasnt even the upstream speed of that anyway.
>
>>> That silly old fart has never ever had a fucking clue, and thats
>>> obviously why even telecom gave it the bums rush, right out the door.
>
>> Other way around, I couldnt get out of there quick enough. I was
>> dying of bordom and lack of a decent wage. I went to a company who
>> paid 3 times as much and give you something to do when a contract was
>> filled. In telecom if we had a 4 month contract and we filled it in 4
>> weeks we had to sit on our arse until the 4 months were over.
>
> You were clearly so stupid that you didnt even notice that you could
> have faster than 1200/75 if you wanted it, and that that aint 75bpm
> anyway.
>