On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:06:16 -0700, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

>In article <ci5183hr8s6n0dgqrs6dk83298reei0g3t@4ax.com>,
> Screw the iPhone <apple@sucks.ass> wrote:
>
>> I could understand it if it were next week and we were reading *real*
>> reports from *real* people about their *real* experiences with the
>> i(diot)Phone. But, it's not, and all else is conjecture until it
>> happens. Now, go back to creaming your jeans waiting for your
>> i(diot)Phone.
>
>Yeah, you're anti-iPhone hysteria is all conjecture too, but it is a
>conjecture that goes against Apple's track record. On the other hand,
>the pro-iPhone conjectures are supported by Apple's track record.

Much like a neutered dog, you just don't get it, do you? I'm always
skeptical over something that generates this much faux "buzz" when two
major companies are involved. Add to that the i(diot)Phone is being
advertised with features I'll never use. It's a PHONE, goddammit.
All I need a PHONE to do is make and receive PHONE CALLS, not watch
stupid YouTube videos or listen to music. That's what computers and
CD players are for. At least if one of those craps out, I still have
the functionality of the other devices. You Kool-aid drinking
lemmings who want to be the de facto guinea pig beta testers for
Crapple and Stinkular are candidates for psychological experiments in
mass mind control (read: cults). All the "hysteria" that you claim is
coming from the i(diot)Phone lemmings. Look at the posts here. But
you go and get your precious i(diot)Phone. And the first post you
make here bitching about it, expect me to jump all over it. Go ahead,
I'll be waiting...