Thread: AT&T vs Verizon
View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2007, 10:35 PM
Todd H.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AT&T vs Verizon

"cranheim" <caranheim@sbcglobal.net.net> writes:
> "Todd H." <t@toddh.net> wrote in message news:84y7i6twh8.fsf@ripco.com...
> > "cranheim" <caranheim@sbcglobal.net.net> writes:
> >
> >> I called another AT&T store to ask about the Krazr phone and was told
> >> they
> >> no longer carry it.

> >
> > That's the 2nd report I've heard of that. I wonder if the Razr 2
> > replaced it in the product line or if Cingular retailers just decided
> > it wasn't profitable enough when another place was selling them for
> > much less.
> >
> > So I lJust called the Wal Mart where I got mine a month ago. They
> > still have the Krazr K1 there for $77.88 for 2yr extension. $50 more
> > for 1yr. When cingular.com had these they wanted something nutty like
> > $199 + 2yr contract.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > --
> > Todd H.
> > http://toddh.net/

>
> Todd,
> I did a search on www.phonescoop.com, entering the carrier, and what phone
> features I would like. One of the phones that came up was a Nokia 6085 that
> appears to be an improvement over the 6102i. I called cingular (AT&T) about
> this, and was told they expect to get the 6085s in mid July. This sounds
> like a good possibility. There will be other Nokia's coming out this summer
> as well. Charles Ranheim


Enjoy!

The only caveat I'd toss in there is that you're pinning hopes
on a feature list rather than a large # of humans actual real world
experience/review with a production phone.

As a counterpoint, the original Razr looked like a wonderful in the
marketing brochure and feature list, but was a performance turd for
many with short battery life, slow response time, spotty production
consistency, many reported lousy rf and audio, etc.

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://toddh.net/

Reply With Quote