On Jun 28, 4:09 am, "Mike Kaliski" <michael.kali...@tesco.net> wrote:
> "Radium" <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1183005481.445745.166800@z28g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi:
>
> > Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question.
>
> > I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation,
> > carriers, and modulators.
>
> > Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a
> > frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles
> > every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and
> > an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose
> > frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
> > nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-
> > eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
> > power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
> > power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond?
>
> > If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why.
>
> > 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an
> > extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
> > power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a
> > nanosecond is shorter than a second.
>
> > 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely
> > large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000
> > gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle.
>
> > Giga-eon = a billion eons
>
> > Eon = a billion years
>
> > Gigacycle = a billion cycles.
>
> > *nanocycle = billionth of a cycle
>
> > Gigaphoton = a billion photons
>
> > 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one
> > large large number.
>
> > 10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000
>
> > So you get:
>
> > (10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
> > power-1,000,000,000)
>
> > 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the-
> > power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000)
>
> > 10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
> > power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to-
> > the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-
> > to-the-power-1,000,000,000)]
>
> > No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the
> > jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am
> > really interested in this.
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Radium
>
> Radium
>
> The answer is no. It takes a finite time for even so called 'instantaneous'
> quantum interactions to occur, so the frequencies quoted are a nonsense.
> Essentially frequencies above around 10 ^ 30 Hz may (as) well not exist. I
> am probably a few orders of magnitude out here, but that is the general
> idea.
>
> For a detailed explaination see "The Road to Reality: A complete Guide to
> the Laws of the Universe by Roger Penrose - ISBN 0739458477". Available from
> Amazon and all good booksellers. Mr. Penrose has collaborated with some of
> the greatest theoretical mathamaticians and physicists of the last fifty
> years and if you can follow the maths, all will become clear. This book will
> explain a lot of the maths required anyway, so worth giving it a go.
>
> Most mathematicians prefer to simplify equations by removing superfluous
> zeroes and exponents by cancellation on either side of the equation. :-)
>
> Mike G0ULI- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

.. . . ? . . .