Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> wrote in news:reply_in_group-
FAE671.18474909072007@news.supernews.com:

> In article <k9adnfZ7Lvz4VQ_bnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d@adelphia.com>,
> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>> Nice try, Phil- they have already said that it was a one-time program
>> involving less than 2,000 of their customers who were being very
>> unrealistic in their expectations
>
> How is it unrealistic to expect that your bill does not contain $10
> overcharges?
>

Not unrealistic at all- I wouldn't be surpised to find well over 99.99% of
the bills cellular providers produce every month are accurate. Are you
claiming that those released from their contracts are spending hours on the
phone over a $10 charge? I've seen no such claim in the media.

I have to admit that I'm finding the reaction to this news to be absolutely
hilarious and sad at the same time. Everybody plotting to use this program
to get out of their commitment- a perfect model of today's consumer.
Everything's disposable, people too stupid to do a little research before
purchasing products, incapable of living with their own decisions and
always blaming others for their problems. Now here comes a company that
takes the same approach with their own logic behind it and people don't
know how to react. Oh wait- yes they do. I smell a class-action in the
future. After all, when all else fails, clog up the legal system. That
2007 Consumer 101.