On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:49:16 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <469d716c$0$27194$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

>Scott wrote:
>
>> And only valid if enforced, which the a.c.c is not.
>
>I was referring to a charter for alt.cellular.attws, which if it ever
>did exist, was never posted by whoever started the group.

You of course have no way of knowing that to be true or not.

>You can't take a charter for another group, and suddenly claim it
>applies to different group because you're mad that people are posting
>content in that other group that you think should be posted in the group
>you wrote a charter for. Everyone knows why Navas is doing this, but it
>doesn't make it valid.

I'm not doing that.

>It does help to have some posting guidelines, even if voluntary, and
>even though they cannot be enforced (nor can a charter on an unmoderated
>group be enforced). At least some posters will pay attention to the
>guidelines, whether an official charter or not. It's rather ironic that
>Navas is probably the single person that most often violates the charter
>that he himself wrote.

That would actually be you.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>