View Single Post
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2007, 01:02 AM
John Navas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why iPhone for Cingular Only?

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:10:25 -0500, karlkrandall@sbcglobal.net wrote in
<6orv93tfb9lunldlpulcd1agot666trres@4ax.com>:

>On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:48:50 GMT, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:37:28 -0700, Tim Smith
>><reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> wrote in
>><reply_in_group-12EDD9.22372807072007@news.supernews.com>:
>>
>>>In article <280620072203091974%fort@his.com.remove.invalid> ,
>>> Charles <fort@his.com.remove.invalid> wrote:
>>>> You keep saying that but you don't know if Apple approached Verizon
>>>> first.
>>>
>>>Yes we do:
>>>
>>><http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-01-28-verizon-iphone_x.htm>

>>
>>That's just Verizon spin, not fact.
>>

>Navas always disputes anything that doesn't fit his strange world
>view.


I actually dispute baloney.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Reply With Quote