"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:dosv931cuhrcg7rk2medvpg0bkcv74lfqi@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:22:09 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
> <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in
> <elmop-145C22.17220919072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com>:
>
>>In article <Nyyni.22565$RX.485@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net>,
>> DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob> wrote:
>>
>>> > That's just Verizon spin, not fact.
>>> >
>>> > "Move along, folks, nothing new here."
>>>
>>> Is it just a Verizon spin (your observation)? How do you know its not
>>> fact?
>>
>>It's Verizon spin because Navas says it's Verizon spin.
>
> It's actually Verizon spin because it's Verizon spin.
>
>>It could NEVER be Navas spin, or whatever it is he spews. Navas would
>>NEVER lie in any way. Why, he's as much as told us that. Therefore it
>>must be true.
>
> Not confirmed by credible sources like NYT, WP, and/or WSJ.

I knew he would (Try to) dispute the fact.

> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>