Arno Wagner wrote:
> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Conor <conor.turton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <5gtu53F30ebl3U1@mid.individual.net>, Arno Wagner says...
>
>>> The right Linux distro (e.g. Ubuntu) is much more viable today
>>> than everything MS offers.
>
>> It isn't. Shall we start with Wifi?
>
>>> True, there is a bit of a learning
>>> curve, but there is with Vista (e.g.) as well. And unlike Windows,
>>> what you learn with Linux stays valid for decades. No need to
>>> re-learn everything every few years.
>>>
>> No need to relearn everything with Windows. Windows didn't become what
>> it is today by making massive changes.
>
> Well, as long as you stay on the surface. true. As soon as you
> have a problem or want a bit more, not true anymore.
>
> Arno

Erm, W2k, XP and Vista are very very similar when the surface is
scratched.... In the same way that Win95, 98, 98se and Me are very similar.

Gaz