On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:37:05 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:50:35 +0100, Mark McIntyre
><markmcintyre@spamcop.net> wrote in
><el5t93126tbngvsbnpph6d33j72174mels@4ax.com>:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:19:56 GMT, in alt.internet.wireless , John
>>Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>>It's patently bad, as anyone in security would tell you.
>>
>>This is a repetition of what you said earlier, with an irrelevant
>>appeal to higher authority tacked on the end.
>
>Actually lots of confirmation on the Internet.

No, lots of FUD on the internet.

>>By this definition, any non-opensource security programme is useless
>>unsafe junk, including Cisco firewalls, all commercial AV systems and
>>the IDS used by Nasa. I don't buy that ludicrous argument.
>
>Pretty much, your opinion notwithstanding.

Then frankly, you're an idiot. my opinion notwithstanding.

>>In other words, the anti-gibson bandwagon rolls on, unencumbered by
>>any need to provide evicence.
>
>On the contrary -- been there, done that.

Like I said, unencumbered by the need to provide evidence.
--
Mark McIntyre