In news:6CFzi.156147$qj5.68459@fe19.usenetserver.com,
balsofsteele@gmail.com <balsofsteele@gmail.com> typed:
> Jim Dubya wrote:
>> <balsofsteele@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>> You are a putz and with the email address that you are using, you seem to
>> also have the ego to go with the putzism. :-)
>
> I've only ever heard two types of people use the word "putz" in real
> life. One is older jewish men, the other is retards on the Internet
> that watched Coming To America one too many times.
>
>> CDMA conversations are digitally encoded spread spectrum are private,
>> however it is possible for the CIA to "listen-in". Your ham radio
>> (overpowered CB that operates on 2m/70cm ) uses simple FM transmission
>> and can be monitored by any kid with a Police Scanner. As I said before,
>> 1900 MHz works just fine if it is deployed correctly. A good example is
>> the 1800 MHz GSM cell phone networks in Europe that work very well
>> because they are properly deployed. Does that make sense?
>
> Ok, so what you're saying is: $20 off ebay can monitor my ham radio, but
> it actually takes some effort to decode cellular. No shit, sherlock.
> Just because you can't buy the hardware to do the decoding for $20 off
> ebay doesn't mean it isn't available.
>
> End result is the same - neither is anywhere near secure.
>
No difference in security when using a device which can be received by a
$20.00 monitor from E-Bay and a $100,000+ Government only piece of
sophisticated equipment. http://rfdesign.com/mag/702RFDEF2.pdf