In article <fb8k89$5eg$2@news.datemas.de>, lenny <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote:

>If you were to read a bit more you'd realise that it was a New Scientist
>story reported in the Daily Mail and I would not be surprised if it wasn't
>carried in other papers (Telegraph for example).

If you were to read something other than the gutter press, you would
find that what the scientists *actually* reported was temporarily
increased production of a chemical that can stimulate cell growth and
division, in cells in the laboratory. They have not shown that mobile
phone radiation can cause cancer, increased immigration, or a house
price collapse.

-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.