On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:07:10 UTC, lenny <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:04:07 +0100, Clint Sharp wrote:
>
> > In message <13di74cg0eqkp16@corp.supernews.com>, Eric Parker
> > <newsnet@thedrossericparker.plus.com> writes
> >>
> >>"Roger" <rfm@aber.ac.uk> wrote in message
> >>news:1188591339.274236@leri.aber.ac.uk...
> >>>
> >>> Suddenly lenny reminds me of the Simpsons!
> >>
> >>Oh no.
> >>
> >>The Simpsons reminds me of myself, so by association ....
> >>
> >>Eric
> >>
> > Lenny, Most clueless usenet poster. EVER.
>
> unpleasant truths are always ridiculed/attacked prior to acceptance.

But you *are* clueless, lenny. You quote all these wonderful articles as
it they are the only thing out there, ignoring the 99% of studies that
contradict one study you quote. Or you quote a paper that says something
totally different if read in depth - which implies either that you
haven't read it, or you haven't understood it.

That's clueless.

--
[ 7'ism - a condition by which the sufferer experiences an inability
to give concise answers, express reasoned argument or opinion.
Usually accompanied by silly noises and gestures - incurable, early
euthanasia recommended. ]