"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:te9ud3545mnsrnck7cl5hd800dm3rt4efr@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:36:59 -0400, "Dana" <raff242@yahoo.com> wrote in
> <379fe$46d843b0$944e306e$27233@STARBAND.NET>:
>
>>"DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> wrote in message
>>news:Xns999CBF5867BE2thisnthatadelphianet@216.19 6.97.142...
>>>>> Using Wi-Fi for police and fire is a Really Bad Idea(tm)!
>>>>
>>>> Not at all.
>>>
>>> Sure it's a bad idea. Police, fire and other emergency response units
>>> need
>>> a reliable means of communication. You get a couple of file-sharing
>>> users
>>> on and the whole thing goes to pot.
>>
>>Proper design will ensure that the bandwidth for police, fire, etc is
>>preserved.
>
> Unfortunately, there's really no way to do that with standard Wi-Fi.

Sure there is. It is called proper design and engineering.