View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:27 PM
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Difference between Linkys WAP54G and WET54G

Bucky <uw_badgers@email.com> hath wroth:

>On Sep 6, 10:08 am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
>> someone recently found out the hard way that two recent firmware
>> versions for the DWL-2100AP will not pass multiple MAC addresses in
>> client mode. I've had the same problem with combinations of the
>> WAP54G and assorted wireless routers.


>I understand the multiple MAC addresses issue if hooking up a hub/
>switch to a wireless client adapter. But about hooking up a router
>with NAT to the wireless client adapter?


That always works. There's only one MAC addresses that needs to be
sent over the wireless bridge and the added router NAT takes care of
the multiple clients. The downside is that you end up with what's
called "double NAT", which causes problems for any service that needs
to go from the internet, throught two routers, and to the client.
Double NAT is not a major problem as most services will work. At
worst, one gets to setup port forwarding in BOTH routers for each
service.

>Is the multiple MAC address
>issue still relevant for that?


No.

>My thinking is that the wireless client
>adapter only sees one device, the router w/ NAT.


Correct.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Reply With Quote