On Oct 5, 11:29 pm, RCC <richard@mapson_cowling1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <1191618985.470999.79...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups. com>,
> Ed_Zep <ed_...@ntlworld.com> writes>I've ordered the Samsung but noticed that I can get the Nokia ten
> >pounds cheaper.
>
> >I went for Samsung as I've had 2 Nokias and fancied a change!
>
> >Is that Samsung a better phone?
>
> >Thanks a lot.
>
> Just got the Samsung as first phone for my son - seems excellent &
> looks/feels good as well. Charged and FULLY discharged (ignore low
> battery warnings, let it run out) a couple of times and battery life
> improved measurably. May not be as robust as Nokia, but for £50 its
> amazing value.
>
> Having some trouble setting mp3 as ringtone although spec says you can
> do it - probably finger trouble on my part. Not sure about file formats
> (advice welcome) Bluetooth to my laptop works very easily. Will go to
> 7dayshop.com to buy a micro SD at some point as the memory is not that
> big.
>
> Well pleased: my own phone (Nokia 6310) looks like an antique now. Might
> even get one for myself as the calender and contacts are pretty good -
> can then stop carrying Nokia and Palm. Samsung pc suite (free download)
> is good so you can update contacts and diary on pc rather than through
> the numeric keypad and just synchronise it all. Seems a bit cleaner than
> the Nokia pc suite but I am still using 4.3 so don't know what the
> latest version Nokia looks like.
> --
> Richard C

Thanks for that, Richard.

Sounds like a decent phone.

Regards,
Ed.