"bill" <someone@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:ffd3s8$265h$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "bill" <someone@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
>> news:ffc89j$21gi$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
>>> Alice wrote:
>>>> bill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's ribbish, I'm sick of hearing it.
>>>> So put some earmuffs on.
>>>>
>>>> Next-G coverage matches CDMA,
>>>>
>>>> I know at least three areas where NextG coverage does not match
>>>> CDMA.Period.
>>>>
>>> How are you measuring that when there is no handset that can do both.
>>
>> Not too difficult to carry 2 handsets........
>
> Different handsets will have different results no matter what network
> they're on.

So would a single handset that operates in both modes.

>
>>
>>> Most Next G handsets can access the GSM network but there's no CDMA
>>> compatibility.
>>
>> What's that got to do with it?
>>
>
> The fact that you need one handset to test coverage.

Bullshit.

> You can easily compare Next G and GSM from the one handset

Wrong.

> but not CDMA and Next G.

They both have the same problem.

--
Kwyj.