"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message news:jgkeegan-9CA4DD.22194724102007@individual.net...
> In article <AvmdnQllz6Cqd4LanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@giganews.com>,

>> > top-posting once defines the poster as usenet illiterate.
>> >
>> > top posting twice defines the poster as rude and illiterate.
>> >
>> > top posting more than twice defines the poster as obstinately
>> > ignorant.
>> >
>>
>> Bitching incessantly about it defines the poster as a sanctimonious asshole.
>
> then you admit you are a "sanctimonious asshole" since you have
> posted on the topic far more than i have. i agree with your self
> evaluation.
>>
>> Labeling someone based only because of how they post is shortsighted and
>> close-minded.
>
> on the contrary, it is a response to visible events, and a fair one.
>
>> Posting the same lame crap as the above, makes the poster a pretentious jerk.
>
> then why did you do it? are you saying you are also a "pretentious
> jerk?"
>
> you've been labeled a hypocrite before, haven't you?
>

The last response is certainly predictable - and VERY typical - for a prick know it all.

YOU now take it down to the level of a 4 yr old playground spat - he said - no HE said....

The key differential here is that I didn't comment a SINGLE word on someone's
posting method until (whomever) attacked and made themselves a large PITA.

Defense vs offence - there IS a BIG difference. And it is always the same.
I have NEVER seen someone bitch about bottom posting - NEVER.

Copping an attitude of 'you are illiterate and ignorant if' is textbook net jerk.

ANY neutral party can certainly see just whom is being an ass in all of this.

And... it isn't me.

Buh Bye now - you can't play nice, so the playground is closed.