Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Alan Parkington <parkingtona@team.telstra.com> wrote

>>> From
>>> http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15082/127/

>>> Unless the government intervenes,

>> Which it already has. It changed the license conditions for a reason, fuckwit.

> To give itself the POWER to intervene, no evidence they will do that

Every evidence, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.

Govts dont change license conditions because they have run
out of something to do, they change them because they plan
to use the change, you stupid dunny cleaning fuckwit child.

>>> but the chairman of on its resellers, Fone Zone, has revealed

>> He didnt 'reveal', he CLAIMED, a different matter entirely.

> Correct. FZ doesnt have access to Telstra subscribers numbers

>>> that there are still almost 900,000 customers on the network.

>> What matters is how many of those still use it.

> Exactly. Plenty of people dont

>>> Fone Zone's chairman, Brian Finn, told the company's AGM on 29
>>> October that "there are still more than 880,000 CDMA customers who will need to move to the Next G network in the
>>> next few months

>> Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

> In fact, NONE of them 'need' to move, they can be disconnected if they like

>>> "By migrating now customers can also avoid any last minute rush,

>> Makes a lot more sense to wait till Jan when it will be clearer
>> what the govt of the day plans to do about the shutdown.

> Just dont expect that the last offer is the best offer

Bet it will be.

>> With any luck telstra will be told that they wont be allowed to shut it down, ever.

> you are dreamin'

We'll see. Dont forget that the cdma system was only introduced because
of the massive shit fight that developed IN AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN
about the imminent shutting of the AMPS system.