In the Usenet newsgroup alt.computer.security, in article
<fZWdnQknfrlCl4feRVn-hw@adelphia.com>, Imhotep wrote:

>Moe Trin wrote:
>
>> I've been using UNIX since 4.1BSD (and I _still_ hate csh).

>What do you prefer? zsh?

I stay with the Bourne shell - either direct, or BASH, and on rare
occasions the Korn shell.

>Ah come on EMACS baby!!! (I bet your a vi guy!)

---------------------
EMACS == Eight Megs And Constantly Swapping
---------------------
"Emacs is a great OS. The only thing it lacks is a decent editor."
---------------------
Computers tend to come with at least 512Mb RAM these days. Half for X,
half for emacs, what's the problem?
---------------------
"Thanks to the joint efforts of OpenOffice, Mozilla, and a few others, Emacs
officially entered the category of lightweight utilities." -- kalifa on /.
---------------------

So, when the computer is sick and barely able to open one eye - what do
you have access to? EMACS? Heck, if you're lucky, you have vi - maybe
only ed - otherwise, it's 'echo', redirection, and filename globbing.
That's why I've stuck with vi over the years.

Old guy