Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
news:C36B41EF.9A91F%CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com:

> "Tinman" <ask@for.it> stated in post
> 5qma25F10qt2qU1@mid.individual.net on 11/22/07 2:19 PM:
>
>> David Friedman wrote:
>>> In article <5qm2koF10ss2nU1@mid.individual.net>, "Tinman"
>>> <ask@for.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But do please list all of the phones with "twice or four times the"
>>>> resolution so we end this silly "huge" comment once and for all.
>>>> Absurd.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Nokia E90 works out to about two times the iPhone's resolution.
>>> It's also heavier and more expensive.
>>
>> That's one, and its main display isn't even twice the resolution.
>> Indeed a phone that is more than twice the size, with not quite twice
>> the resolution, released with a glaring defect, can't really be used
>> to argue that the iPhone is "huge." Not claiming you were arguing
>> that, but I bring it up nonetheless.
>>
>> Still waiting for the list of phones that are smaller than the iPhone
>> and have two to *four* (chuckle) times the resolution. Until then
>> this comment from the cosmic brainiac is a joke: "iPhone is huge
>> compared to devices which have twice or four times the screen
>> resolution."
>>
> Hey! Do I get to add that claim of his to the list I started with his
> other BS claims:
>


You probably could if he was responding to me, numbnuts.

Damn, Shit- you are clueless.