jl <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:dc783363-1f53-4a29-9f44-
5e9d0e7c6c46@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com:


>>
>
> My dear hysterical and uncommonly funny shill, you are correct that I
> am in error about the sim card. A Verizon employee told me their
> phones used sim cards. He WAS in sales, but I don't know where he is
> now. Now that I have read up on the subject I know a little more
> about how Verizon phones work but still do not understand why I cannot
> take a phone I bought at Verizon to use with another carrier. But
> then I am not trained in that technology and don't dissimulate to be
> an authority as you do, nor do I fracture the rules of logical debate
> as you do either. But the fact I cannot use a Verizon phone at
> another company is no condemnation of Verizon, although its abysmal
> service and deceptive trade practices are matters to be considered on
> the question of its corporate integrity.
>
> The point is that Verizon has delivered lousy merchandise and
> dishonest customer relations in exchange for my folding money. That
> they have delivered equivalent services for equivalent money for
> others does not mean they don't need to be called on the rug and held
> to account for malperformance in my case and on the account of others
> they have mistreated. And they tried to pull off a cheat again by
> adding services which I did not purchase. Therefore, my relationship
> with them and my conversation with you ( a rather obvious little
> toady) are terminated.
> [snip drivel]
>

Wait- I can translate that for everybody else:

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

You're an idiot, and unless you profess to be perfect, should be able to
see that you fury is misplaced and that an acceptable resolution was
available to you.