"IMHO IIRC" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:PJL3j.7513$KK1.4959@newsfe24.lga...
> In news:EeK3j.71973$YL5.27005@newssvr29.news.prodigy. net,
> ed <news@no-atwistedweb-spam.com> typed:
>> "Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@superart.com> wrote in message
>> news:linuxlovesosx-A4B1C2.23222628112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net...
>>> News <News@Groups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...And can roam seamlessly between cells/APs...
>>>
>>> as you can with apple's wireless base stations since the beginning of
>>> 802.11 time...
>>>
>>> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=58596
>>
>> uh, yeah, but the basestations need to be connected together with
>> ethernet...
>>
>> <snip>
>
> Minor insignificant detail. Oxford might be working on a plan to
> implement
> this everywhere and for free. lol
>
>
>
>

Yeah, if it's "hip" enough, whether it loses money or not won't matter.
He'll lose money on every installation and every minute someone uses it but
he'll make it up in volume (volume of shares of stock sold to idiots, that
is).