CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:

> >> Wow! Let's see how Oxford's going to explain a 3G iPhone after he's
> >> spent five months explaining how it was unnecessary (due to WiFi) and
> >> would have made it too bulky and power consuming!
> >
> > this is old news, apple will use 3G/4G/??,
>
> You said they would never use 3g.

yes, not in its current form. it's abundantly clear the current 3G
chipset isn't up to Apple's engineering standards so they can't use it.

> > but they are working hard
> > to fix the current 3G chip design first,
>
> No they're not- a real technology comapny will be providing the chip.

Apple is one of the top engineering firms in the world. Remember when
they had to go into Intel and clean up their design processes? Apple is
the primary master of small electronics in the world. Nobody in the PC
side, MP3 side or Phone side can measure up to their level of skills
with chip design. If 3G is fixable, only Apple has the ability to do it.
If not, 4G or WiMax will be used.

> > then helping AT&T build out
> > the network if Steve gives the go ahead.
>
> False.

You have no clue do you Cozmic, quick talking out your ass and deal with
the facts.

> > Hard to say what the future of 3G is until that happens. Steve may go
> > with WiMax or 4G, or something entirely unseen at this point, so the
> > Cell Companies have to wait on Steve to show his hand until they can
> > move forward.
>
> Wait a minute- I don't see your free wifi on that list. Are you saying
> that wifi will be dead soon?

WiFi remains the primary data access method for iPhone users since it's
around twice as fast as 3G. Stick with facts Cozmic.