Scott wrote:

> You can quote all the surveys you want, but you need to paint the whole
> picture. No carrier has numbers that even rate them in the middle of any
> other industry, including Verizon. And that goes for all aspects of the
> service. Being the tallest pygmy still makes you a pygmy.

Comparing the wireless industry to other industries and making
proclamations about how other industries are ranked higher is
meaningless. The only relevant comparison is within a particular
industry. It's especially true in the case of something like wireless
where people's frame of reference is the reliability of their landline,
rather than other wireless communication systems.

> I have now decided that you should be referred to as Navas, Jr. for your
> fanboi approach to Verizon. Just like Navas with Cingular/ATT, Verizon can
> do no wrong in your eyes.

Check some of my earlier posts. Some of things I've criticized them for
include:

-Defeaturing of handsets, including removing the multimedia and file
transfer capability in Motorola Phone Tools

-Removing off-extended network roaming in AC2

-Eliminating holidays as off-peak calling

-Moving from 8pm to 9pm for off-peak calling in the western region

-Increasing prices surreptitiously, by making previously included
features an extra-cost option, then later adding the extra cost back and
incuding the feature again.


I'm not sure what your agenda is in making up these stories. Unlike
Navas, I always provide references for the statements I make. I don't
make stuff up out of thin air like he does.