Re: Discussion Regarding Digital Signatures On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:48:25 +0200, Eugene Mayevski wrote:
> Hello!
> You wrote on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:14:03 -0500:
>
> A> By "look-a-like, I mean that the signature needs to be a duplicate of
> A> the Signer's handwriting. The only way I know to do this (easily) is by
> A> using a digital pad, then having that signature inserted.
>
> This is what I am saying about. Scan a signature into the graphic file and
> insert the graphic file.
>
> With best regards,
> Eugene Mayevski
Yeah, I see the issue is that we have dumb users and the concept of having
them digitize their signatures, then manually add the signature (with the
graphic file) isn't going to work. Which is why I am thinking of coding the
ID security, the digital signature capability and the signature look-a-like
insertion all into one. |