Michael wrote...

> > Wow. 0.9 percent increase. I'm impressed. Of course, it's probably in
> > areas where it's not needed...

> The differential b/w 98.9 and 98.0 is 400,000 sq km. Which is apparantly
> twice the size of Victoria, fool

What an offensive prick you are.

In any case, this "0.9%" increase could well be somewhere like the Simpson
Desert where it matters fuck all in the grand scheme of things. What matters if
that the coverage is extended where people actually go.

It would be nice, if but a pipe dream, that Telstra coverage maps were actually
accurate and truly represented the coverage that people get and we could then
overlay the CDMA one with the NextG one to see what the difference actually is.

But that'd be asking too much, wouldn't it?