Number 2 it is then...

I am not contending that anyone's "equipments" are inferior.
(English is your second language huh??)

Or anyone's "equipments" is superior for that matter. What IS
fact is that it doesn't really matter in this discussion.

YOU stated that "Sprint has the same "ventors" cell sites as Verizon.
The different can be the handsets."

Translation: because Sprint and Verizon use the same infrastructure
equipment vendors, they are essentially the same and therefore any
user or coverage problems must be primarily in the users handset.

This is simply preposterous and I was pointing out various reasons why.
It is obvious you will continue your inane argument, so there is no point
in my continuing further.

Or, you may choose to actually see the fact(s)...


"Uno" <Uno@Max.com> wrote in message
news:%eUkj.685$hI1.568@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
> This is no BS. Sprint has the same quality cellular equipments from the
> same quality CDMA telecom supplyers.
>