Re: Twist in Telstra sex romp case Horry wrote:
> Why? Surely a company is allowed to set standards as to the moral
> character of its employees?
>
> Or are you commenting on some procedural matter in the courts of which I'm
> not aware ("Telstra's actions *in this case*...").
What moral standards apply here? There was no crime committed, the
three were consenting adults fucking in a bath tub. Big FUCKING deal,
good luck to them.
The stupid bitch that walked in on them obviously didn't knock before
she entered and it didn't happen during work or at work, so what FUCKING
business was it of Tel$tra anyway?
--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.
73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452> |