Rod Speed wrote:
> DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>
>>> Wrong again. GSM has a digital cliff that cdma doesnt.
>
>> "Extended range" GSM overcomes that.
>
> Nope, it just changes the distance at which the digital cliff cuts in and
> has other significant downsides, which is why it isnt used much at all.

Ummm....I think you missed my sarcasm there. Navas has repeatedly
insisted he experienced "extended GSM" (extended in the sense of
extended range, not in the industry definition sense of extended
frequency range).

His proof consisted of, "I experienced it and therefore it happened" and
"I spoke with an engineer friend and he said it was certainly possible."

He has consistently failed to provide credible professional links that
any U.S. carrier has deployed extended (range) GSM.