Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> In alt.cellular.attws SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for all the citations, but I'm sure you've figured out by now
>> that a) Navas never cites but demands that everyone else cit, and b)
>> even when you do provide extensive citations he simply ignores them.
>>
>
> I would like to note that cross-post novice does indeed post citations from
> time to time. He did for me just yesterday or the day before. They weren't
> particularily supportive though.
>
>> One thing that Verizon has apparently done in their 1900 MHz markets is
>> to make a big effort to compensate for the less desirable spectrum by
>> adding more cells. Look at Miami, Tampa, and Dallas, where in each case
>> Verizon at 1900 MHz did better in terms of "Dropped Calls" and "No
>> Service" than AT&T at 800 MHz.
>>
>>
>> [Note: alt.cellular.attws added to follow-up. Cingular no longer exists.
>> alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding AT&T's
>> Wireless Service. Please add alt.cellular.attws to follow-ups from
>> alt.cellular.cingular, and do not post new posts to alt.cellular.cingular]
>
> Forgetting to follow you own advice here?

No. For new posts they should be posted only to alt.cellular.attws.
However for existing posts in alt.cellular.cingular, it makes sense to
not break up the thread.