nemo_outis wrote:

> George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote in
> news:bf6ea79edec361e1aad589185e7d1167@mixmaster.it :
>
> > nemo_outis wrote:
> ...
> >> As for an unencrypted partition table disclosing info, that
> >> trivial info is useless for decrypting the contents of the
> >> partitions or even inferring the nature of what is contained
> >> in them.
>
> > I see. So now you believe you're smarter than all the encryption
> > and cryptanalysis experts that ever lived, combined.
>
>
> You see little and comprehend less.
>
> If you have some argument to show how an unencrypted partition
> table would permit decrypting the contents of of an encrypted

Nobody ever said anything at all like that you lying asshole.
You've already been clubbed over the head with a cite about why
unencrypted partition tables are less secure than encrypted ones.
You didn't even have the courage to reply to it, but it's out there
none the less.

> partition, then make it. If not, then, as I have repeatedly
> suggested: Do be a good little moron and fuck off.
>
> Regards,