nemo_outis wrote:

> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:9c560c5e4d435ab2734ae2e076739ea3@dizum.com:
>
> Back again with the same bullshit? You get the same answer as
> last time.
>
> If you have some argument to show how an unencrypted partition
> table would permit decrypting the contents of of an encrypted
> partition, then make it. If not, then, as I have repeatedly
> suggested: Do be a good little moron and fuck off.

You've already been given a cite explaining exactly how and why
unencrypted partition tables are a risk. How they can in FACT aid
in the cryptanalysis of an encrypted volume, and you damned well
know it or you wouldn't have made a pathetic attempt to twist
things into some discussion of absolutes.

Your willingness to make fool of yourself through blatant
dishonesty is fast becoming your most defining quality nemo.