John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> amazed us all with the following
in news:es09r3dnll0c74d5e7nvda9nt4qq66iic2@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:04:43 -0600, The Bob <nospam@bob.com> wrote in
> <Xns9A4470B2FA74Fbob@216.196.97.136>:
>
>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> amazed us all with the
>>following in news809r3lo5l72sohu4nlp2e08d8e56isjtc@4ax.com:
>
>>> Yet another unsubstantiated personal speculation.
>>
>>Or an observation based on my experience and substantial knowledge of
>>the sector.
>
> In other words, just what I wrote.

Where did I present it as anything but that? Are you saying that you are
the only one here allowed to present opinion?

>
>>> Got anything more
>>> substantial, or are we expected to just take your word for it?
>>
>>Isn't that what you expect from us? To simply take you at your word?
>
> In other words you don't, as that lame defense makes clear.
>

In other words, don't bash that which you are so famous for.