On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:06:48 -0600, The Bob <nospam@bob.com> wrote in
<Xns9A48D6C5A78FDbob@216.196.97.136>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> amazed us all with the following
>in news:3pjkr3dovrjg9rr3s6qhcfr5jaca1fdtuk@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:27:53 -0600, The Bob <nospam@bob.com> wrote in
>> <Xns9A48B1A88BA10bob@216.196.97.136>:
>>
>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> amazed us all with the
>>>following in
>>>news:21juj.622511$kj1.68930@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
>>>
>>>> CHARTER:
>>>
>>>So much for civility. You had an opportunity to show yours and you
>>>opted not to.
>>
>> On the contrary. My offer was spurned from the getgo. I nonetheless
>> was thinking seriously of not posting today, but a new spate of
>> insults made me realize that would be at best pointless, if not
>> counterproductive.
>
>So you are admitting that the posting of the charter was purely out of
>spite. How mature.

Nothing of the sort. My offer made it clear that while there was
nothing inappropriate about the posting, I was willing to do what
I could if it would result in as little as a 50% reduction in
incivility. What's immature and purely out of spite are the ongoing
personal attacks and inappropriate meta-discussions, your own conduct
being a notable case in point:

I don't expect you to get it, John. We're dealing with a market
sector that you don't have any experience in, and factors of
corporate economics that you've never had to consider before.

... John can continue to obsess ...

You need to understand that you're not talking to John Navas here.
You may consider yourself an expert on everything as John does, but
just like John, your ego drives your posts.

Sorry, John. This coming from you comes across as very insincere.

In other words, don't bash that which you are so famous for.

Hypocrisy, thy name is The Bob.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T/CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ>