Einstein wrote:

>You said max length. Ooops! Of course that only saves you from sloppy
>downards level work, but imo if someone was after you, this would now
>give them the correct length to try instead of working their way up.
>It is 7 bits larger than the one below (If we assume 128 outcomes, but
>your not quite there) however the man now discounts all other size
>standards, saving some brute force time.

I fail to see how someone password guessing on a website can
possibly know that the particular account he is trying to
crack belongs to a particular pseudononymous poster in an
obscure newsgroup.

>Still you are as close to maximal security as can be created.
>Now I ask, why the hell do you need this much security? lol

Because once I decided hat I needed somthing better than using
the name of my cat on every website and started using a list of
passwords, it was almost no extra effort to use maximum-length
randomish data for those passwords.