On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:01:34 -0600, t@toddh.net (Todd H.) wrote in
<84skznv1lt@news.giganews.com>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:19:47 -0600, t@toddh.net (Todd H.) wrote in
>> <84d4qrfq2k@news.giganews.com>:
>>
>>>As for a cite, anyone who visited news.cnet.com today would've tripped
>>>over the headline:
>>
>> Thanks for the insult.
>
>It wasn't meant as an insult, but rather criticism of criticism.

It looked like an insult to me, and still does. I've been to several
news sites today, and didn't see anything on this until now. If I had,
then I would not have asked.

>Why be a pain in the ass over a cite when a) you rarely give them
>yourself,

In fact I probably post more links than anyone else here. I just don't
post them over and over.

and b) one for this was exceedingly easy to find?"

I'm not interested in a potential wild goose chase, having been sent on
too many of those already.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http:/navasgroup.com>

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford