Todd H. wrote:
> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:19:47 -0600, t@toddh.net (Todd H.) wrote in
>> <84d4qrfq2k@news.giganews.com>:
>>
>>> As for a cite, anyone who visited news.cnet.com today would've tripped
>>> over the headline:
>> Thanks for the insult.
>
> It wasn't meant as an insult, but rather criticism of criticism.
>
> Why be a pain in the ass over a cite when a) you rarely give them
> yourself, and b) one for this was exceedingly easy to find?"

For such a widely publicized and current news item I didn't see the need
to include a link, but "he who must not be named" isn't happy unless he
has something to complain about. Yet he rarely includes any citations on
anything he posts because when you make up stuff out of thin air it's
tough to find any citations to back you up.