John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> amazed us all with the following
in news:ui0pr31cjamk4bmqnuunrbjnbo9rqghda9@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:33:13 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> wrote in <47bc71b5$0$36410$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>
>>Todd H. wrote:
>>
>>> As for a cite, anyone who visited news.cnet.com today would've
>>> tripped over the headline:
>>>
>>> http://www.news.com/Sprint-expected-...call-plans/210
>>> 0-1039_3-6231277.html?tag=nefd.top
>>
>>Actually I saw the "$60-80" from
>>"http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/02/20/ap4676170.html"
>>
>>It's always amusing to see "he who must not be named" demanding
>>citations for widely disseminated news stories, while at the same time
>>never providing citations for any of the claims he makes up, and never
>>providing any factual basis for disputing any of the citations that
>>others make.
>
> Total nonsense.
>
>>He's never provided a citation for extended GSM, despite repeated
>>requests.
>
> Actually several of them.
>

None that have pointed outside of a usenet newsgroup.