John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> amazed us all with the following in
news:tcg0s3hqrlmvpl01h1o1io5lkdhkkul8mq@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:19:47 -0600, t@toddh.net (Todd H.) wrote in
> <84d4qrfq2k@news.giganews.com>:
>
>>John, only you would set a followup to alt.cellular.cingular on a post
>>that has to do with multiple carriers pricing. :-)
>
> On the contrary -- that's a blanket follow-up header that I set because
> alt.cellular.attws applies to a carrier now long since defunct. My
> follow-up header isn't even close to the inappropriate thread
> cross-posting and thread/newsgroup hijacking by Steven Scharf (aka SMS,
> aka self-annointed "sfbacellexpert", as typified by
> <news:462cc5ff$0$27218$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>) , and my follow-up
> header is easily ignored in a decent newsreader, but it has outlived its
> raison d'être, and thus your point is well-taken, so I'm eliminating it.
> See how easy that was?
>

Make the charter next.