"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:tcg0s3hqrlmvpl01h1o1io5lkdhkkul8mq@4ax.com...

>>John, only you would set a followup to alt.cellular.cingular on a post
>>that has to do with multiple carriers pricing. :-)
>
> On the contrary -- that's a blanket follow-up header that I set because
> alt.cellular.attws applies to a carrier now long since defunct. My
> follow-up header isn't even close to the inappropriate thread
> cross-posting and thread/newsgroup hijacking by Steven Scharf (aka SMS,
> aka self-annointed "sfbacellexpert"


While both of your actions were childish and wrong, at least Steven just
added alt.cellular.attws to the newsgroups list- he didn't set a follow-up
designed to divert responses ONLY to his NG of choice.

You attempted to hijack all responses to you to alt.cellular.cingular and
alt.cellular.cingular alone. For a guy who claims to desire civility, you
seem to have absolutely no problem emulating behavior you condemn in others.


> my follow-up header is easily ignored in a decent newsreader


So are your posts. I find your postings occasionally informative and
entertaining, but your personal S/N ratio is taking a pretty steep dive
lately.