Ertugrul =?UTF-8?B?U8O2eWxlbWV6?= <es@ertes.de> wrote in news:fpu314$9u4$02
$1@news.t-online.com:

> Unfortunately this is very inaccurate. The mathematics are deniable,
> because there are no security proofs. There is strong evidence towards
> good security, but nothing is proven here. So currently, we can only
> assume security, not take it for granted.

Yes, but as Thoreau reminds us, "Some circumstantial evidence is very
strong, as when you find a trout in the milk."

Regards,